For Sale:

Villa on the
Sea of Cortez

'Casa de la Costa'







The Israel Test

by George Gilder


God and Evolution

Edited by Jay Richards


Signature in The Cell

by Stephen C. Meyer


Money Greed and God

by Jay W. Richards


Support Discovery
Institute Today!


Search Discovery News

« The Reasons to Answer the Census | Main | Stupak Gives In, Way Cleared for Obamacare »

Abortion Con Job Coming Into Open

4084971106_393b7e9a5a.jpg

I pointed out on March 9 that if the White House and Congressional leaders cannot get the health care bill passed, all it will take to sway the final needed votes is a Leadership concession to the handful of Democratic anti-abortion forces. The pro-choice Democrats will make ritual complaints, but they still will vote for the resultant, supposedly "anti-abortion" product.

That is what is now in the works, perhaps, according to The Hill. Watch for developments in the coming hours.

Meanwhile, I repeat my prediction that any such supposed legal agreement will be betrayed. Indeed, it is so obvious to insiders that it will be betrayed (perhaps almost immediately, perhaps after a decent interval of a few months) that some of the anti-abortion Democrats may not go along. However, some will go along because the parliamentary fig-leaf they are being offered gives them a way to pretend that they have not caved in on the abortion issue. Actually, all the Leadership needs is about half the anti-abortion Democratic members. Once the bill's future is secured, Speaker Pelosi can give the other members a pass to vote "no".

As I say, the pro-choice Members of the House, meanwhile, will know full well that any abortion "compromise" is synthetic, a fig leaf. They will pretend otherwise while voting for the bill.

There are so many open deals like this that are tied to certain members and certain districts on the issue of health care "reform" that one can only imagine the behind the scenes deals--the ones based on promises of jobs after a likely election defeat, for example, and the ones based on threats of various kinds. A "no" vote Member can be threatened with everything from loss of a treasured committee assignment--where the real work the House supposedly takes place--to loss of good office space after the next election, not to mention election campaign cash meanwhile. A truly vengeful Leadership could even threaten a potential "no" vote Member with discreet disclosure of unsavory personal information to inquiring media. (Sorry if that sounds cynical.)

It is risky for the Leadership to act in a really vengeful way; there is always next month's votes, and the votes after that. But the stakes are really high now. If the bill passes, watch for more and more deals to come to light. It may be too late, but they will come to light.

Leave a comment

Top Discovery Articles

National Review Online

Livingston Daily

To The Source

National Catholic Register

Discovery Institute

Featured Video

The Deniable Darwin

The Deniable Darwin

by David Berlisnki
Purchase


A Rat is a Pig is a Dog is a Boy