The supposedly august Nature magazine shows its true stuff with an attempt to dismiss the Climate Gate emails. To them, the problem is only computer hacking. That would be quite irrelevant, of course, if the Shoe-on-the-Other-Foot rule were applied; if the Climate Research Unit, in other words, had been covering up evidence for global warming.
Nature's editorial speaks volumes about the way the journal itself is complicit in arrogant avoidance of contrary evidence on this, or any other subject where an iron "consensus" must be established, controlled and enforced.
The big news today is that Australia has just declined to embrace Cap and Trade. In the U.K., the head of the CRU has been forced to step down pending an investigation.
But, pay no attention, Nature says that there's no story here.
